Journal article
Pluralization through epistemic competition: scientific change in times of data-intensive biology



Publication Details
Authors:
Groß, F.; Kranke, N.; Meunier, R.
Publication year:
2019
Journal:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Pages range:
1
Volume number:
41
Issue number:
1
ISSN:
0391-9714

Abstract
We present two case studies from contemporary biology in which we observe conflicts between established and emerging approaches. The first case study discusses the relation between molecular biology and systems biology regarding the explanation of cellular processes, while the second deals with phylogenetic systematics and the challenge posed by recent network approaches to established ideas of evolutionary processes. We show that the emergence of new fields is in both cases driven by the development of high-throughput data generation technologies and the transfer of modeling techniques from other fields. New and emerging views are characterized by different philosophies of nature, i.e. by different ontological and methodological assumptions and epistemic values and virtues. This results in a kind of conflict we call {\textquotedbl}epistemic competition{\textquotedbl} that manifests in two ways: On the one hand, opponents engage in mutual critique and defense of their fundamental assumptions. On the other hand, they compete for the acceptance and integration of the knowledge they provide by a broader scientific community. Despite an initial rhetoric of replacement, the views as well as the respective audiences come to be seen as more clearly distinct during the course of the debate. Hence, we observe-contrary to many other accounts of scientific change-that conflict results in the formation of new niches of research, leading to co-existence and perceived complementarity of approaches. Our model thus contributes to the understanding of the pluralization of the scientific landscape.


Authors/Editors

Last updated on 2019-11-11 at 09:59